<font color="0000ff">This lady submitted a proposal to the Waste Cut Panel regarding Vaccinations. The details are:</font>
From:
[email protected] <
[email protected]>
Date: Jun 17, 2007 1:02 AM
Subject: Acknowledgement email.
To:
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam,
We have received the suggestion below that gave your email address for contact purposes. Please let us know immediately if you were not the person who sent the suggestion. Thank you.
Name: CAROL LOI PUI WAN
Email:
[email protected]
Contact Number: 98476180
Category: Health
Subject: Vaccincations
Suggestion: I refer to the CBS News article at this link:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/06/15/couricandco/entry2934107.shtml?source=search_blog
I would like to suggest that MOH reviews the list of compulsory vaccinations, with the aim to shorten the list to as few as possible. There are risks involved in vaccination. While there is no definitive study linking vaccines to autism or ADD, but there is also no study definitively disproving a link. Since there is free vaccination at polyclinics, shortening the list would reduce government expenditure, at the same time reducing potential risks, especially to those who genetically do not take well to vaccination.
I would like take this opportunity (since MOH officials will be looking at this) to ask the following questions:
a. Re point 7 of the article: Is the test described by the scientist who testified in The Vaccine Court (to test children for a hidden hole in their immune make-up that makes them susceptible to bad immune reactions from vaccinations) available in Singapore? If so, where? If not, why?
b. What are MOH''s efforts in trying to maximize the potential benefits of vaccines and minimize the harm?
Further, I would like to suggest that new parents be fully informed of the benefits and risks of vaccinations though MOH. Just as the list of compulsory vaccinations is given to new parents, there should be an accompanying list describing how vaccines work, potential side effects and reasons for them, and more importantly, the risks involved. This will allow new parents to make informed decisions instead of subjecting their babies to injections automatically, or just because they are legally required to get into schools. The latter is an oppressive way to force parents to comply instead of allowing parents to have the flexibility to decide what is best for their child.
Yours Sincerely,
Alvin Goh
Cut Waste Panel Secretariat
http://www.cutwaste.gov.sg