<font color="ff6000">Hi gals,
sharing my letter that I am going to bombard many agencies, newspapers and maybe blogs with.
===============================================
It is with severe disappointment that I am writing this letter. When it was announced yesterday that the implementation date would be 1 Jan 09 instead of with immediate effect after PM's NDR speech (Aug 08), 30,000 Singaporeans' hearts fell. Most if not all of these couples, pregnant with the 15,000 babies who will be born from Aug-Dec 08 (according to
www.singstat.gov.sg), believed that surely they would benefit from the slew of generous new measures announced by PM.
However, all these hopes were dashed yesterday, leading to widespread anger, frustration and sleeplessness from mummies, most of whom are heavily pregnant in their third trimesters. This has exacerbated our discomfort and many have shared that their babies are restless and sense their distress. It is medically proven that severe changes in mood are translated through to the foetus through the release of hormones that are not healthy for the baby. Many made the effort to travel long distances to for the Meet-the-People session in Ang Mo Kio yesterday at 8pm, only to be told at 11:20pm that only those who were living in Ang Mo Kio could go in. Surely this could have been communicated earlier in the evening? But I digress.
Why should the implementation date be 1 Jan 09? The first to benefit would be those who are less than 4-5 months pregnant. Why are those who are more than 5 months pregnant be discriminated against? Put in a different way, are 5 months old foetuses more valued by the Singaporean Government than 7 month old foetuses? All who are already pregnant have responded to the government's procreation call in the absence of incentives. Shouldn't these couples be the first to be commended and rewarded? Are not all Singaporean babies?
The official lines taken so far are that SMEs need time to adjust to the 4th month of maternity leave. Appeals and mutually-agreeable solutions can be worked out in those situations. However, this line does not take into account multitudes more who work for MNCs and Government agencies who would not find it too difficult to adjust to this new policy, especially since there will effectively be 3 months of notice for all companies to hire staff in time for the 4th month of absence, even if implemented in Aug 08.
What adds insult to injury are that first-time mothers delivering between Aug 08 and Dec 08 will not receive the additional $1000 baby bonus, and $6000 worth of Government matching for CDA funds. We can only be first-time mothers once - why should we be deprived of such valuable financial help, in the face of record-inflation levels in Singapore? This is the only help stay-at-home mums are 'qualified' for as well. Surely the Government should not begrudge those who have sacrificed so much to provide the best care for their offspring the funds to ease pressure off single-income families?
On a related note, why should the IVF policy be implemented immediately then? It simply smacks of double-standards.
I urge the authorities concerned to reconsider before legislating the implementation date for the entire procreation package. The current government positions itself as a consultative one. To refuse to take in feedback and revise plans on such an emotive issue would alienate more Singaporeans, and precisely those Singaporeans whom Singapore cannot afford to entrench a lasting disconnect with, physically and emotionally.
A sizeable portion of the 30,000 parents affected by the implementation gap will be approaching our respective members of Parliament and lobbying them to raise this issue prominently in the coming Parliamentary session. If most of us were not so physically unwieldly, the first demonstration application to NParks at Hong Lim could well constitute a mass of irate pregnant ladies, who see yesterday's announcement as a real kick in the teeth, at a time when we can least afford it, emotionally and financially.</font>