mummyboy (mummygirl),
Kate, Linda and myself will be going for both sessions of the talk.. $10 bucks and inclusive of buffet lunch and high tea! + Goodies .. very worth it.. come join us lah!
Scary incident reported on The NewPaper Yesterday:
Following is the article that some mummies shared pertaining to the couple whose's baby had brain development out of the skull and have to abort the baby during their 6th month! Apparently.. it is quite scary if our gynae dun have up-to date equipments to do a good detailed scan!! Gosh.. it scare the shit out of me manzzz.. i felt like goin for second opinion !
--------------------------------------------
FROM ANTICIPATION Unborn baby scan 1: It's healthy girl
TO DEVASTATION
Baby scan 2 (1 month later): It's sick boy who must be aborted
By Ng Wan Ching
October 12, 2007
THEY were looking forward to having their first child, and were delighted when their doctor told them that everything was going well.
-- Picture: KUA CHEE SIONG
But barely a month later, they got the shock of their lives when another doctor told them that their unborn child was growing with the brain protruding from the skull, and had to be aborted.
Mr Terence Tang and his wife, Mrs Uemura Tang, were devastated.
Mrs Tang, 23, was nearly into her sixth month of pregnancy when she had the abortion.
WANTS TO WARN OTHERS
Mr Tang, a 26-year-old Singaporean, shared his story with The New Paper to warn others that not all scans are accurate.
He even went so far as to say that the first scan should be done by an expert with a machine which can accurately tell the condition of the baby.
Said Mr Tang: 'In my wife's third and fourth month of pregnancy, the first obstetrician and gynaecologist we saw scanned her using an ultrasound scanning machine. He said that our baby was in perfect condition.'
They were very happy to hear that.
'At that point, we were expecting a healthy baby girl,' he added.
The doctor had been recommended to them by a friend.
In the fifth month of Mrs Tang's pregnancy, she was sent by the same doctor to another obstetrician and gynaecologist for a detailed scan.
According to the couple, he had told them that it was routine for him to send his patients to another specialist in the fifth month.
However, the second doctor, at Camden Medical Centre, found something very wrong with the baby.
Said Mr Tang, a mechanical engineer: 'He told us that the baby's skull was not properly developed. The brain was protruding from the skull.
'The size of the protruding brain is about the size of the skull, making the circumference of the head much smaller compared with other five-month old foetuses.'
And at this clinic, they were also told that it was a boy.
'He told us that the baby would not have any chance of surviving until the due date. He recommended that we abort as soon as possible to avoid the danger to my wife, should the baby get bigger,' said Mr Tang.
Reeling from the news, he and his wife sought an explanation from their first doctor.
'He also recommended that we abort immediately,' said Mr Tang.
The scan at Camden was on 7 Aug, less than a month after the fourth-month scan on 16 Jul.
He had to pay $250 for the scan done at Camden Medical Centre.
'How could my perfect baby become a baby with his brains outside his head in that time?'
By that time, his wife had had four scans done by the first doctor.
They had signed up for a maternity package, costing $500, which did not include delivery charges, during Mrs Tang's second month of pregnancy.
When the couple pressed the doctor for an explanation, they claim his reply was that his machine was not so good, and he could not see the foetus clearly.
'He said the view of his scanning machine was so small that he could not differentiate the protruding brain from the skull, and his machine doesn't have the zoom function, thus he couldn't see the defect,' Mr Tang said.
The obstetrician and gynaecologist, who has his practice in the Eastern part of Singapore, declined to reply to queries from The New Paper.
Other doctors The New Paper spoke to said that while it was possible to detect such a defect earlier, it depends on the individual case.
In some babies, the abnormality gets more visible as the baby grows bigger.
The impact on the couple could have been much less traumatic if the defect had been picked up earlier, during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy.
Mrs Tang could have had a simpler procedure to take the foetus out, say doctors. It would have involved using a scraping or suction instrument to remove tissue from the lining of the uterus.
It takes only a few hours of the patient's time and would have cost less than $1,000.
But an abortion during the second trimester is more complicated.
Mrs Tang, a Thai, returned to Bangkok to abort her child.
Said Mr Tang: 'She did not want to do it in Singapore because she had lost confidence and also because of cost.'
He said their first obstetrician and gynaecologist had told them that it would cost $3,500 if he were to do it for them.
Other doctors quoted $2,000 to $3,000, including doctor's and hospital fees.
Mr and Mrs Tang flew to Bangkok and went to the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital on 9 Aug.
Said Mrs Tang: 'I also wanted to confirm the diagnosis. I wanted to know if there was a chance I could have kept the baby.'
After about two weeks of more scans and tests, the hospital confirmed that the baby would not have any chance of survival.
SIX MONTHS INTO PREGNANCY
But she could not do the abortion at that hospital as it would have required a two-week wait.
'By then, she was almost six months into her pregnancy. We felt such a late abortion would have been dangerous,' said Mr Tang.
So Mrs Tang went to the private Kluay Nam Thai Hospital, on 22 Aug to get it done.
The doctor gave her medication to cause her to go into labour.
'She took the medication around 9am. Then she went into labour. It was very difficult for her to be in so much pain, knowing that she wouldn't be able to keep the baby later,' said Mr Tang.
The labour lasted more than 12 hours.
Mrs Tang gave birth to her baby past 10pm that night.
'Only her mother saw the baby. My wife didn't want to see it. My mother-in-law said it was very small and it was dead,' said Mr Tang.
She stayed overnight at the hospital and was discharged the next day.
The couple spent more than $2,000, including budget airfares and medical fees for the tests and abortion in Bangkok.
Since then, Mrs Tang has been crying almost every night, said Mr Tang. 'If our first doctor had picked up the baby's condition earlier, say in the third month, she wouldn't have been so traumatised. From the fourth month, she could feel the baby kick,' said Mr Tang.
'She wouldn't have been pregnant for so long and she would not have needed to give birth.'